6/02/2007

Blue Suede Shoes

Blue Suede Shoes


by Jeanette Lin April, 2007

I saw the ballet performance 'Blue Suede Shoes' at San Jose Center for the Performing Arts on March 24, 2007. It was choreographed by Dennis Nahat, costumes and scenery were designed Bob Machie, and the dancers were from the Ballet San Jose Company. The music, of course, was sung by Elvis Presley.

The Blue Suede Shoes tells a story, but it has nothing to do with Presley himself. As summarized in the review in the Mercury News on March 21, 2007, by Rita Felcian, "From the hundreds of Elvis' songs…Nahat gathered about 30 and shaped them around a narrative about three buddies…they fall in love; they compete, and finally part on their way to adulthood."

In the opening scenes, the numerous duet dancers, dressed in yellow, orange, blue, green, and other contrasting bright colors, rocked with the seemingly carefree, energetic songs such as "Guitar Man" and "Blue Suede Shoes", combined with the sun beaming lighting. It was dazzling in sight and sound, and I felt like dancing with them.

The performance was organized in 7 or 8 scenes, from high school to graduation, to army, and to jail, etc. In one of the high school scenes, we saw a bunch of high school students standing in line balance and dancing in unison on campus. The utilized motifs included twisting torsos and legs, waving arms, turning and jumping, especially with men lifting women (support change). The overall energy quality was free, light, buoyant, and quick. Stillness was used to create a dramatic freeze, or to transition to a new move or to end, or to give the audience an opportunity to applaud.


One cannot help but wonder why the choreographer would combine classic ballet with rock-and-roll music. Mr. Nahat said, "In 1955, when we first heard his music, it was as if a sledgehammer had come down on the heads of all Americans." He and many of his contemporaries certainly were deeply in love with Elvis. That is why it was his long-time dream to make such a ballet.

To me, however, they were like the scenes from the old American movies of the 60s. Although it was before my time and totally different from what I experienced in high school in Taiwan (plain uniforms, no dating allowed, and short hair), I could appreciate the highly dramatic, flashy performance because it was just fun to watch. And even though I am not a big fan of Elvis, I am familiar with some of his songs and have seen his movies.

I liked the humor in the choreography. In a couple of scenes, the male dancers flashed their butts briefly. Likewise in the story, one of the heroes, who was very short, was pursuing a tall, slim, beautiful girl. When they danced together, the difference in their heights made it look so silly.

I was especially impressed with two dance segments. In the Heartbreak Hotel scene, the three heroes were sitting on chairs in a triangle formation in line balance, with one in the down right side, the second in the up right side, and the third in the down left side of the stage. They changed their outfits in unison, indicating they were getting dressed to check out of the hotel. When I first saw the performance, I actually was not aware of the storyline, so I was very intrigued by the fact you did not need to move a lot to create interesting dance movements.

The other one is in the Wooden Heart scene. The background was a large clock, like one you would see in the city square of a German town. The female dancers, dressed in traditional German costumes, played the parts of the mechanical figures in the clock. They twirled out of one side and back in the other side of the clock, one after another, in cannon. The robotic, restrained moves, and the tumbling steps of the dancers were indeed a big contrast to those earlier movements of free and quick energy quality.

In the final scene, the three buddies got together and put on their blue suede shoes doing a reprise of the dance motifs. They looked happy and energized, seemingly ready to face anything ahead.

We may ask: what was the message from such a performance? What did it try to tell us? In the words of the choreographer, "we saw Elvis as one of us, just a decent guy with a message, a message we could understand: Freedom. Isn't that what America stood for?" I would add to that: I think it is also about optimism, love and friendship, and an opportunity to fulfill your dreams even when there are setbacks in life.

Blue Suede Shoes 藍絨皮鞋
by Carl Perkins

歌詞

Well it's one for the money, two for the show
Three to get ready, now go cat, go
But don't you step on my blue suede shoes
Well, you can do anything but lay off of my blue suede shoes

Well you can knock me down, slap in my face
Slander my name all over the place
And do anything that you wanna do
But oh-oh honey lay off of my shoes
But don't you step on my blue suede shoes
Well, you can do anything but lay off of my blue suede shoes

Well you can burn my house, steal my car
Drink my liquor from my ol' fruit jar
Do anything that you wanna do
But oh-oh honey lay off of my shoes
Now don't you step on my blue suede shoes
You can do anything but lay off of my blue suede shoes

6/01/2007

[耶誕節]

如何過一個多彩多姿的聖誕節和新年?答案是:家中有個五歲兒!

美國學校的聖誕活動
女兒蘿拉今年五歲,上公立幼稚園和中文學校,美國學校的聖誕假期只有兩周。她中文學校的好友已提前請假一周,返回台灣過節了,我覺得兩周時間太短,長途旅行又太累,不如就留在美國過節。

我是第一次接觸到美國學校的聖誕活動,女兒的學校活動也不少。有一晚是表演唱聖誕歌,每個年級都要表演,父母親和家人可以去欣賞和照相。
另一個活動是去看「胡桃鉗」芭蕾舞劇,我們一些家長和老師陪女兒全校的小朋友一起步行,前往加州聖荷西市的表演廳,去觀賞免費的專業芭蕾舞表演,小朋友看到精彩的地方,都用力鼓掌叫好。 去年聖誕節前,我們也自己來看了「胡桃鉗」表演,今年女兒已經可以閱讀識字,也學過一點芭蕾,了解想必深入一些,我也買了幾本故事繪本,好讓她對劇情和主角先有些了解。
蘿拉是小野菊(DAISY)女童軍的一員,領導人特別安排在聖誕佳節期間,讓這一群五歲的小女孩到老人院獻唱聖誕歌。她就開始天天在家練習We wish you a merry Christmas, Rudolf the red-nose reindeer, Jingle bell等歌,而且強迫我們要專心聆聽。我的反應由一開始的驚喜,到最後,一旦看到她又要唱歌,我就逃之夭夭。
誕樹
聖誕節就少不了聖誕樹,我們直到去年(2004年),女兒四歲多,才決定買第一棵活的聖誕樹,會散發清香,有六英呎高。再買了大大小小的圓球、胡桃鉗人像、串珠、燈泡、糖果手杖等飾品,加上女兒自己畫的雪人、聖誕樹和薑餅人掛飾,把樹裝點的十分美麗。
我們今年也如法泡製,還加買一件圓形的聖誕樹裙,鋪在樹下,再放上一些包裝精緻的真假禮物,哇塞,真是很溫馨。雖然住在美國十幾年了,也看過很多聖誕樹,但是要等到自己擁有一棵樹時,才會真正張大眼睛,來仔細觀察其他的樹,也了解每棵聖誕樹背後都有一些故事及用心。
狄斯尼樂園我們另一個計畫是:開車前往狄斯尼樂園。這是女兒第一次去狄斯尼樂園,也是我們一家三口首次的長途旅行。女兒不了解六、七小時的車程有多久,每隔幾分鐘就問:「到了嗎?」
雖然是聖誕節前夕,狄斯尼樂園內仍擠滿了人,女兒坐了小飛象、旋轉木馬、轉動的茶杯,看阿拉丁和茉莉公主舞台劇,與玩具總動員(TOY STORY)的主角伍迪(WUDY)合照,還買了狄斯尼開幕五十週年版的米奇和米妮玩偶。
在汽車旅館的兩張雙人床上,女兒開心的跳來跳去,還讚美旅館的被套十分美麗,我很欣賞孩子的天真無邪,獨具慧眼。她一路上都是開開心心的,沒有任何怨言。我其實對狄斯尼樂園興趣缺缺,但看到孩子開心,也就無怨無悔。



我們往北回家的途中,順道去了聖塔巴巴拉(Santa Barbara),女兒在沙灘上築沙堡和奔跑嬉戲;在洛杉磯漢庭頓花園(Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Garden)裡的兒童花園中,女兒隱身於園內噴出的水氣雲霧中,只露出一張笑臉,又是一個珍貴的鏡頭!還有去了丹麥城,看到一棟棟城堡似的商店,她吃了又厚又香的丹麥巧克力和道地的Danish丹麥麵包電子賀卡
在聖誕節和新春假期間,除了旅行之外,向親友祝福問候也是一項主要的活動。在這個數位化的時代,朋友互相問候的方式也改變了,今年我自己用Flash 製作一張電子賀卡,也收到各方寄來的電子賀卡,傳統的卡片收的最少。
相信有不少人用過免費網路電話和寬頻影像(webcam),我是最近才開始使用yahoo messenger來與台灣的家人通話,透過網路,母親就可以看到遠在美國的蘿拉現在的模樣,也可看到我們家中的聖誕樹。

朋友
在美國的朋友並不多,平日也很少能見面。很驚喜的是,有對夫妻朋友邀我們在除夕下午,去家中喝下午茶;新年當天,我們一時興起,邀請另一對有孩子的夫妻來家中吃火鍋、大家熱鬧的吃飯聊天,孩子也開心的玩在一起。

我跟蘿拉說她可以像故事中的「灰姑娘」一樣,到午夜十二點之後才睡,平時,她九點就要上床,蘿拉真的與爸爸撐到午夜十二點,向全世界的人用拉炮說聲:「新年快樂」。至於我,早已支撐不住,進入夢鄉了。

結語
我們今年慶祝的方式真的比較多樣化!我相信這是一個美好的回憶,尤其是對女兒蘿拉而言。我可以想像,她長大一些時,會向朋友說:「當我五歲時,我爸媽第一次帶我去狄斯尼樂園...」

M.C. Escher

REGARDING“ASCENDING AND DESCENDING”(Artwork by M. C. Escher, 1960)

by Jeanette Lin, May, 2007

WHAT IS IT
I went to an exhibition titled "M. C. Escher: Rhythm of Illusion" at San Jose Museum of Art on February 18, 2007.

I actually have not heard of this artist's name before, but he must be very famous because there was such a big turnout in the museum. I learned that he was an important leader in the form of Optical Art, and he was Dutch and lived from 1898 to 1972.

One work struck me the most is the one titled Ascending and Descending.

It is a small-scale black and white (or gray scale) print (ink and paper as media) of a bird's eye view of a multi-level building with people marching up and down steps around the courtyard of the roof. The artist used a technique called Lithograph.

HOW DOES IT MAKE ME FEEL?
At first glance it looks like a precise and complicated architectural drawing of an old monastery or a historical building with a number of gabbles, arched doors, windows, and steps. I was amazed at the wide-angle view and its 3D effect, and was intrigued by the marching of many little faceless figures on the rooftop.

I wondered what were they doing there, why, and who were they? The two rows of opposite facing people seemed like from the Middle Age, wearing armor and helmets; on the other hand, they seemed like many identical robots from the modern day marching in a loop. But could it be so simple?

I was curious about what the illusion was about, so I stood there, looking at the picture over and over again. I chose a point, and followed the 14 figures in the outer square marching up the stairs, and then I followed the 12 figures in the inner ring going downstairs.

I was anxious and puzzled because everything seemed logical. I have had many similar experiences of passing by a stranger walking at the opposite direction. Finally, I got the answer and felt a sense of awe and amusingly surprised!

HOW IS THE WORK STRUCTURED?

The picture plane is vertically oriented with very little negative space, and it is especially divided by a diagonal axes vertically inclined from upper right to lower left. Its focal point lies in the rectangular courtyard of the building located on the top area of the plane. The building is viewed from the air as a bird's eye view. It gives a 3-D illusion by including the Sagittal axis to create the depth, and by using different tones, such as highlights and shadows, in the achromatic image.

The artist used a lot of hard-edged, precise, restrained lines to create the geometric shapes of arch (doors), rectangle (windows, stairs), square (roofs, windows), and triangle motifs. Another major motif is the identical faceless robotic human figures.

I am not sure about the symmetry part of this work. The overall single building seems to be asymmetric, but we can see the translational symmetry in the human figures. The building complex appears to be massive, strong and grand with several rooms or sections combined and it has fancy architectural details such as pillars and arches.

CONTEXTS
According to the biography by Taschen in a book titled M.C. Escher, Escher was influenced by an article by Roger Primrose about "impossible objects".


It says, "This inspired him to produce the famous Ascending and Descending, which is based on the endless stairway described in the article." (p.20)

As I mentioned earlier, I have not heard of this artist before. Interestingly enough, I took a computer class last semester, and the teacher introduced us to the concept of Op. Art.

She asked us to make one-inch grids to fill the whole page, and then the progressive grids of different sizes and shapes. Suddenly, the image can change into various "illusions", such as 3-D, or bending, waving effects. Besides being amused, I can add this technique into my own creative toolbox.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
If the idea of "impossible object" is indeed the inspiration, I suppose the key lies with the impossible "reality" that the human figures marching upstairs and the people marching downstairs meet at the same spot.

The people are faceless and robotic, as if they are doing some military drills, with the exception of two "run-away" figures. One is located at the left side of the plane, his body leaning against the fence of the third-level balcony, either looking at the sky or the marching people. The second figure sits on the stairs facing the right side of the plane, and nobody knows what he or she is looking at or thinking about.

Is it possible that they are actually the same one individual? Like each of us, we do the same routines over and over like climbing stairs. We may want to believe we are making progress, but we actually go back to the same spot.

Sometimes we are tired of this routine, and then we might detach ourselves to take a more objective view of our lives and others from a distance.

Or sometimes we just want to go back to our own inner world. It may seem motionless but it is actually very powerful and "productive" than the seemly business and purposeless motion.

It provokes my own examining of my own life and thus I feel expanded and connected.